Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01066
Original file (MD04-01066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD04-01066

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040616. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041222. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I was an exceptional Marine up until the incident which caused me to be discharged. During my final physical, the Military found that I had diabetes. I believe that my sugar levels may have caused me to make the bad decisions I made which led up to my discharge.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                010215 - 010311  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 010312               Date of Discharge: 030314

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 00 03
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 53

 Highest Rank: LCpl                         MOS: 3051

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (3)                       Conduct: 4.3 (3)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 1

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

001129:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
020821:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [DWI, wrongful appropriation of a government vehicle, wrongful disposition of a government vehicle and unauthorized absence.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
020830:  NAVDRUGLAB [JACKSONVILLE], reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 020823, tested positive for [Cocaine].

021213:  Applicant discharged from Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program. Discharge Diagnosis: Cocaine Diagnosis. Comments: The patient was discharged as a Minimally Successful Completion with a fair prognosis based upon his intent to implement a structured recovery program.

030130:  Summary Court Martial
         Charge I: Violation Art 86.
                  Spec I: Absent from appointed place of duty at 1500 on 020820.
         Charge II: Violation Art 92.
                  Spec I: Fail to obey a regulation by taking a government vehicle into the town of Jacksonville.
                  Spec II: Violate order by viewing pornographic material on a government computer.
         Charge III: Violation Art 111.
                  Spec I: Operate a government vehicle under the influence of a impairing substance.
         Charge IV: Violation Art 112a.
                  Spec I: Wrongfully use cocaine.
         Pleas and Findings: To all charges and specifications, Guilty.
         Sentence: RIR E-1, forf 2/3 for 1 mo., 30 das conf deferred 10 das.
         CA: Approved and ordered executed.

030130:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB Jacksonville FL MSG whereas [Applicant] tested positive for Cocaine and the Military Police report where he operated a government vehicle while under the influence of Cocaine.

030131:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
030205:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was NAVDRUGLAB Jacksonville FL MSG whereas [Applicant] tested positive for Cocaine and the Military Police report where he operated a government vehicle while under the influence of Cocaine.

030210:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

030211:  GCMCA [CG, 2dFSSG] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.



PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW


Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20030314 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The Applicant states, “I was an exceptional Marine up until the incident which caused me to be discharged.” Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service record is marred by a court-martial conviction for illegal drug use, unauthorized absence and driving a vehicle under the influence of an impairing substance, thus substantiating the misconduct for which he was separated. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore consider his discharge proper and equitable. Relief denied.

The Applicant contends his disciplinary problems were the result of sugar levels causing him to make bad decisions. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the Marine Corps is challenging. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to endure the hardships and sacrifices required in order to serve their country. It must be noted that most members of the Marine Corps serve honorably and therefore earn their honorable discharges. In fairness to those members, commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Marines receive no higher characterization than is due. The NDRB found that the Applicant's service was equitably characterized. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01363

    Original file (ND04-01363.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). I was wrongfully accused and convicted of using drugs, although I had taken several urinalysis tests during my 30 plus months of service. There is no requirement that such evidence take the form of a positive urinalysis.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00600

    Original file (MD04-00600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. ________________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501250

    Original file (ND0501250.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant was awarded nonjudicial punishment for violations of UCMJ Articles 92 and 112a. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501269

    Original file (MD0501269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01269 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050714. Charge II: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 90: Specification: Received a lawful command from First Lieutenant R_ C. F_ USMC, not to go on leave or words to that effect did go on leave on or about 2145 5 July willfully disobey an order. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20000922 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00399

    Original file (MD99-00399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :920213: Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.930622: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: disobey a lawful written order, to wit: MARCORPBASEJAPANO 10120.1A, by driving a POV without a driver's license.Awarded forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 1 month. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00864

    Original file (MD04-00864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00864 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040427. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. The Applicant’s Representative states that “this Applicant is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00699

    Original file (ND04-00699.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00699 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040325. 030313: Chief of Naval Education and Training directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00894

    Original file (MD02-00894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 Letter to Applicant from Continental Airlines dated March 28, 2001 Letter from Houston Aviation Admission Council, undated Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration card issued March 10, 2001 Certificate of recognition dated May 24, 2000 Certificate of graduation dated February 23, 2001 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00939

    Original file (MD03-00939.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00939 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030424. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mistakes can happen for one or two reasons, the first is for you to Learn from the mistake.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01333

    Original file (MD03-01333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01333 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030805. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 000814: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.010123: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...